Citation:
Hong MA and Zhimin WANG. The Designing Principles of Legal System of Environmental Pollution Liability Insurance[J]. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(11): 96-106.
The Designing Principles of Legal System of Environmental Pollution Liability Insurance
-
Abstract
The absence of relevant legislation has failed the pilot program of environmental pollution liability insurance. From the program and from legislative experience abroad, the liability insurance should be based on a model of “voluntary participation as a rule and compulsory participation as an exception”. Logically, it should be governed by both Insurance Law and Environmental Protection Law. With breakthroughs and experience of the enactment of Civil Codes, the design of Environmental Pollution Liability Insurance Law needs amendment of Environmental Protection Law and Insurance Law, and needs to be embedded in the framework of Environmental Protection Law; and also, be put into the liability insurance section of Insurance Law. So, the amendment of Insurance Law and the legislation of environmental pollution liability insurance are required, naming specific areas for compulsory participation, and unnamed areas for voluntary participation. With such a specific and specialized legislation, integrity and flexibility of the legal system can be achieved.
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
Shaohua ZHENG
, Hui WANG
. Environmental Code: Its Positioning and Codification. Academic Monthly,
2020, 52(8): 129-141.
-
[2]
Bing ZHU
. The Analysis on the Environmental Right from the Perspective of Property Legislation. Academic Monthly,
2018, 50(11): 104-119.
-
[3]
XIE Jing
. A Comparative Research of Property Crime System in The Qing Code. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(10): 99-108.
-
[4]
. . Academic Monthly,
2016, 48(07): 66-78.
-
[5]
Jin DING
. New Interpretation of the Law of Government Subordination in Zhou Li. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(12): 165-175.
-
[6]
. . Academic Monthly,
2017, 49(11): 89-127.
-
[7]
Yuefeng CHEN
. Regulating Risk Administration from the Perspective of the Law of Administrative Action. Academic Monthly,
2020, 52(6): 98-110, 97.
-
[8]
Haibo SUN
. Reflections on Moral Legislation from the Perspective of Legal Philosophy. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(5): 106-119.
-
[9]
Shi’e ZHU
, Rudai YANG
, Bi WU
. New Rural Society Endowment Insurance Program and Household Consumption. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(11): 60-69.
-
[10]
,
. . Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(6): 209-216.
-
[11]
Haoran PENG
, Jinglun YUE
. Integration of China’s Basic Medical Insurance System: Theoretical Debate, Practical Progress and Future Prospects. Academic Monthly,
2020, 52(11): 55-65.
-
[12]
Zhipeng HE
, Tianjiao SHEN
. Study on the Power of International Soft Law in Global Governance. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(1): 103-116.
-
[13]
Jinzhao CHEN
. Return to the Logical Starting Point of Legal Thinking by Fiction. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(1): 117-129.
-
[14]
Lixin HAN
. The Contemporary Significance of Study on Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(4): 5-16.
-
[15]
. . Academic Monthly,
2016, 48(05): 27-33.
-
[16]
Fan YANG
. The Social Foundation of Legal Normativity: Recasting the Habermas-Foucault Debate in Context with Legal Philosophy. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(12): 93-105.
-
[17]
. . Academic Monthly,
2016, 48(07): 60-65.
-
[18]
Shiyi CHEN
, Chaoliang LIU
, Hao JIN
. Environmental Regulation, Labor Allocation and High-Quality Urban Development. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(2): 48-62.
-
[19]
Shouqiu CAI
. New Development in practice and Theory of Environment Right. Academic Monthly,
2018, 50(11): 89-103.
-
[20]
CHEN Shiyi
. Economic Growth and Environmental Justice —— Evidence from China's Economic Zone Program. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(7): 31-45.
-
-