政治学视域下的马克思主义人类学

陶庆; 梁晓安

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

November 2022

Article Contents

Citation: Qing TAO and Xiao’an LIANG. Marxist Anthropological Research in the Perspective of Political Science[J]. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(8): 67-79. shu

Marxist Anthropological Research in the Perspective of Political Science

Abstract

Since the 1970s, extensive and in-depth researches on Marxist anthropology have been made on the basis of Marx’s Anthropological Notes in his later years. However, it still presents in an academically chaotic way. Based on the comprehensive review of important research works from home and abroad, this paper summarizes and analyzes the different types of anthropology, e.g. philosophical anthropology (anthropological philosophy), historical anthropology (historical materialism) and empirical anthropology (social anthropology), and finds that Marxist anthropology is a grand proposition spanning many disciplines, which was originated from western learning itself. However, the field of Marxist anthropology is still in a complicated state full of unpredictability and confusion, due to the continuous widening of interdisciplinary boundaries, which was mostly resulted from the overlapping barriers between various disciplines and the rapid development along their own inertia force. Therefore, only by combing the above traditional research methods of Marxist anthropology can we truly and effectively introduce it into the cross and compound academic realm of scientification of political science, and develop a new Marxist Anthropology with Chinese discourse and characteristics under the paradigm of neo-political anthropology.
- politics,
- Anthropological Notes,
- Marxist anthropology,
- scientification of political science
References
Access
1. [1]
  Zhengxu WANG . Order and Prosperity: An Institutionalist Framework for First Questions of Politics. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(3): 110-123.
2. [2]
  , . . Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(1): 208-216.
3. [3]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(01): 30-45.
4. [4]
  , . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(02): 106-116.
5. [5]
  Guangbin YANG . The Agenda of Political Science in China in the Age of the Great Transformation. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(9): 5-14.
6. [6]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(09): 70-80.
7. [7]
  LIN Qing . The Hobbes Element in Biopolitics. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(9): 22-30.
8. [8]
  Zhongyuan WANG , Sujian GUO . Forty Years of Development of Chinese Political Science: History, Challenges and Prospects. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(12): 75-85.
9. [9]
  Ping HE . New Culture Movement and the Opening of Sinicization of Marxist Philosophy. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(1): 11-24.
10. [10]
  Feng REN . The research on Chinese Political Tradition and the Possibility of Historical Politics. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(1): 73-83.
11. [11]
  Yucheng SANG , Tianhang MA . Forty Years of Chinese Political Science: Agenda Setting and Political Development. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(12): 60-70.
12. [12]
  WEN Shi . . Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(6): 206-211.
13. [13]
  . A Depoliticized Program of Political Philosophy. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(03): 57-65.
14. [14]
  Shuxian YE . Anthropological Turn: An Interdisciplinary Leader of New Liberal Arts. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(8): 143-154.
15. [15]
  Shipeng ZOU . Marx’s Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of State and Law and the Basic Orientation of State Socialization. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(6): 19-30.
16. [16]
  LI Dianlai . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(8): 20-32.
17. [17]
  WANG Zhijian . The Ideological Analysis of Rawls's “Political Turn”. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(7): 23-30.
18. [18]
  Zhenhua HUANG . Household Logic of National Governance: An Analytical Approach Based on Field Politics. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(7): 91-104, 178.
19. [19]
  MO Weimin . Witnessing “The Differend”—— Exploring Lyotard’s Politics of Philosophy. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(2): 45-56.
20. [20]
  ZHANG Shuping . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(9): 110-120.

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 387 Times PDF downloads: 4 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(4)
Abstract views(387)
HTML views(59)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Marxist Anthropological Research in the Perspective of Political Science

Qing TAO
Xiao’an LIANG

Available Online: 2022-08-20

Abstract: Since the 1970s, extensive and in-depth researches on Marxist anthropology have been made on the basis of Marx’s Anthropological Notes in his later years. However, it still presents in an academically chaotic way. Based on the comprehensive review of important research works from home and abroad, this paper summarizes and analyzes the different types of anthropology, e.g. philosophical anthropology (anthropological philosophy), historical anthropology (historical materialism) and empirical anthropology (social anthropology), and finds that Marxist anthropology is a grand proposition spanning many disciplines, which was originated from western learning itself. However, the field of Marxist anthropology is still in a complicated state full of unpredictability and confusion, due to the continuous widening of interdisciplinary boundaries, which was mostly resulted from the overlapping barriers between various disciplines and the rapid development along their own inertia force. Therefore, only by combing the above traditional research methods of Marxist anthropology can we truly and effectively introduce it into the cross and compound academic realm of scientification of political science, and develop a new Marxist Anthropology with Chinese discourse and characteristics under the paradigm of neo-political anthropology.

HTML

Relative (20)

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Return

Marxist Anthropological Research in the Perspective of Political Science

Abstract

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Marxist Anthropological Research in the Perspective of Political Science

HTML

目录