共享经济是“伪共享”吗？

王宁

English

共享经济是“伪共享”吗？

王宁

引用本文: 王宁. 共享经济是“伪共享”吗？[J]. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(4): 129-141. shu

Citation: Ning WANG. Is Sharing Economy “Pseudo Sharing”[J]. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(4): 129-141. shu

共享经济是“伪共享”吗？—共享经济的社会学探析

王宁

作者简介: 王宁，中山大学社会学与人类学学院教授（广东广州 510275）;

中图分类号: C91

Is Sharing Economy “Pseudo Sharing”

Ning WANG

Available Online: 2021-04-20
CLC number: C91

摘要: 共享经济研究的进一步深入面临着概念瓶颈。有鉴于此，有学者试图正本清源，从原型共享（如家庭共享和旧石器时代的社群共享）来界定当下的共享经济，并因此宣称带有营利动机的商业型共享经济平台为“伪共享”。作者不同意这种对共享经济的界定立场。共享经济其实主要是一种经济业态，不应以原型共享做评判标准。共享经济乃是一种循环经济的一部分，而市场交换是实现资源在社会网络中循环的一个有效方式。因此，共享经济既包括非营利的、作为社会创新的共享实践，也包括营利的、作为商业创新的共享经济实践。它是二者叠加而成的复合体。而造成二者可以叠加在一起的条件，是数字和通信技术革命。数字与互联网平台让共享经济成为替代传统的浪费性消费体制的一种新型消费体制，即循环式消费体制。与这种消费体制转型相对应，已经去商品化的私人资源可以再度商品化，私人性可以去私人化，从而导致私人领域的深刻转型。
- 共享经济 /
- 循环经济 /
- 消费体制 /
- 社会创新 /
- 商业创新
Abstract: Researches on the sharing economy are now bottlenecked by conceptual confusions and ambiguity. Different scholars define the sharing economy in various and ambiguous ways. The variety and ambiguity in defining the sharing economy become one of factors that impede our deepening researches into the sharing economy. In order to solve this problem, some scholars try to define the sharing economy in terms of the prototypes of sharing, such as mothering and pooling and allocation of resources in family (Belk 2010) and claim that profit-driven “sharing economy”, such as Airbnb and Uber, are in fact “pseudo sharing” (Belk 2014). I disagree with this position. The sharing economy is a new form of business and should not be assessed in terms of the prototype of sharing. The sharing economy should be regarded as part of circular economy, and market exchange should be treated as one of means to making resources circular in a wider scope. The sharing economy consists of two different parts: the nonprofit-driven part and the profit-driven part. The former is the result of social innovation and the latter the result of commercial innovation. The sharing economy is the composition of these two parts. What make this composition possible is the digital and communication revolution. Digital and internet platforms have brought about a new regime of consumption, i.e., the regime of circular consumption, which tend to replace traditional regime of wasteful consumption. With this transformation, commodities bought by consumers and hence de-commodified, can be re-commodified in the sharing economy. This has consequently brought about transformation in private domains.
- sharing economy /
- circular economy /
- regime of consumption /
- social innovation /
- commercial innovation
1. [1]
  张道根 . 中国经济制度创新的政治经济学分析. 学术月刊, 2020, 52(3): 5-14.
2. [2]
  刘亮沈桂龙 . “共享经济”与公共政策融合的内在逻辑. 学术月刊, 2018, 50(04): 86-97.
3. [3]
  殷德生 , 吴虹仪 , 王奕鋆 . 中国市场化改革路径与转型经济理论创新. 学术月刊, 2017, 49(06): 74-82.
4. [4]
  张建华 , 周玉雯 . 基于中国实践的发展经济学理论创新. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(11): 39-48.
5. [5]
  ● 陈钊 , ○ 张卓韧 . 经济学研究：问题导向、创新意识和科学方法. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(1): 211-216.
6. [6]
  权衡 . 世界经济增长分析框架：新变量及其创新发展. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(7): 43-52.
7. [7]
  黄少安 . 中国改革开放以来主要的经济理论创新. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(3): 39-47.
8. [8]
  任保平 . 新中国70年经济发展的逻辑与发展经济学领域的重大创新. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(8): 27-36.
9. [9]
  王星 . 技能形成、技能形成体制及其经济社会学的研究展望. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(7): 132-143.
10. [10]
  刘志彪 . 高水平社会主义市场经济体制：框架、挑战与对策. 学术月刊, 2023, 55(4): 82-90.
11. [11]
  张广婷 . “一带一路”倡议与国际政治经济的理论创新——一个分析框架. 学术月刊, 2023, 55(9): 43-57.
12. [12]
  黄少安 . 完整的唯物史观和社会主义经济体制选择与改革. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(2): 36-47.
13. [13]
  周天勇 . 深化土地体制改革与理顺经济运行. 学术月刊, 2020, 52(2): 30-43, 57.
14. [14]
  李友梅 . 新公共性与中国转型社会学理论范式创新. 学术月刊, 2024, 56(2): 5-20.
15. [15]
  肖瑛 . 非历史无创新——中国社会学研究的历史转向. 学术月刊, 2016, 48(09): 15-16.
16. [16]
  张道根 . 经济制度变迁逻辑与中国经济体制改革. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(1): 58-67.
17. [17]
  黄祖辉 , 刘炎周 , 王雨祥 , 陈帅 . 中间投入还是产品创新. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(10): 43-58.
18. [18]
  周天勇 . 体制剩余：转轨经济学的一个重要范畴. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(4): 45-55.
19. [19]
  郑振满 . 明清时期的林业经济与山区社会. 学术月刊, 2020, 52(2): 148-158.
20. [20]
  陆臻 . 传播政治经济学视野中的“生产型消费者”—— 以网络小说“粉丝”为例. 学术月刊, 2017, 49(04): 113-119.

点击查看大图

计量

PDF下载量: 19
文章访问数: 1092
HTML全文浏览量: 195

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

共享经济是“伪共享”吗？

王宁

作者简介:王宁，中山大学社会学与人类学学院教授（广东广州 510275）

网络出版日期: 2021-04-20

关键词:

摘要: 共享经济研究的进一步深入面临着概念瓶颈。有鉴于此，有学者试图正本清源，从原型共享（如家庭共享和旧石器时代的社群共享）来界定当下的共享经济，并因此宣称带有营利动机的商业型共享经济平台为“伪共享”。作者不同意这种对共享经济的界定立场。共享经济其实主要是一种经济业态，不应以原型共享做评判标准。共享经济乃是一种循环经济的一部分，而市场交换是实现资源在社会网络中循环的一个有效方式。因此，共享经济既包括非营利的、作为社会创新的共享实践，也包括营利的、作为商业创新的共享经济实践。它是二者叠加而成的复合体。而造成二者可以叠加在一起的条件，是数字和通信技术革命。数字与互联网平台让共享经济成为替代传统的浪费性消费体制的一种新型消费体制，即循环式消费体制。与这种消费体制转型相对应，已经去商品化的私人资源可以再度商品化，私人性可以去私人化，从而导致私人领域的深刻转型。

English Abstract

Is Sharing Economy “Pseudo Sharing”

Ning WANG

Available Online: 2021-04-20

Abstract: Researches on the sharing economy are now bottlenecked by conceptual confusions and ambiguity. Different scholars define the sharing economy in various and ambiguous ways. The variety and ambiguity in defining the sharing economy become one of factors that impede our deepening researches into the sharing economy. In order to solve this problem, some scholars try to define the sharing economy in terms of the prototypes of sharing, such as mothering and pooling and allocation of resources in family (Belk 2010) and claim that profit-driven “sharing economy”, such as Airbnb and Uber, are in fact “pseudo sharing” (Belk 2014). I disagree with this position. The sharing economy is a new form of business and should not be assessed in terms of the prototype of sharing. The sharing economy should be regarded as part of circular economy, and market exchange should be treated as one of means to making resources circular in a wider scope. The sharing economy consists of two different parts: the nonprofit-driven part and the profit-driven part. The former is the result of social innovation and the latter the result of commercial innovation. The sharing economy is the composition of these two parts. What make this composition possible is the digital and communication revolution. Digital and internet platforms have brought about a new regime of consumption, i.e., the regime of circular consumption, which tend to replace traditional regime of wasteful consumption. With this transformation, commodities bought by consumers and hence de-commodified, can be re-commodified in the sharing economy. This has consequently brought about transformation in private domains.

共享经济是“伪共享”吗？—共享经济的社会学探析

作者简介: 王宁，中山大学社会学与人类学学院教授（广东广州 510275）;

Is Sharing Economy “Pseudo Sharing”

计量

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

共享经济是“伪共享”吗？

作者简介:王宁，中山大学社会学与人类学学院教授（广东广州 510275）

English Abstract

Is Sharing Economy “Pseudo Sharing”

全文HTML

目录

共享经济是“伪共享”吗？—共享经济的社会学探析

作者简介: 王宁，中山大学社会学与人类学学院教授（广东广州 510275）;

Is Sharing Economy “Pseudo Sharing”

计量

文章相关

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

共享经济是“伪共享”吗？

作者简介:王宁，中山大学社会学与人类学学院教授（广东广州 510275）

English Abstract

Is Sharing Economy “Pseudo Sharing”

全文HTML

目录