Citation:
Jian XU. Rethinking Triangle-rimed Animal-motif Mirrors: From Antiquarianism, Material History to Historical Archaeology[J]. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(3): 193-200.
Rethinking Triangle-rimed Animal-motif Mirrors: From Antiquarianism, Material History to Historical Archaeology
-
Abstract
Triangle-rimed animal-motif mirrors, solely found in Japan, are named after their physical characteristics of rim’s triangle shape in profile and images of gods and beasts as major motifs. Traditionally, it has been widely accepted by Japanese scholars that triangle-rimed animal-motif mirrors are among gifts sent by the Emperor Ming of Wei kingdom to the Queen Himiko during the Three Kingdoms period, as recorded in History of Wu. Based on archaeological findings, Wang Zhongshu pointed out that these mirrors are not of Wei stylistically. Instead, a hypothesis of produced by Wu mirror masters in Japan was proposed. However, either the hypothesis of Wei or that of Wu is not convincing, by distinguished flaws in understanding essence and methods of historical archaeology. Although closely related, it is not the liability of historical archaeology to provide concrete evidence to support the parallel textual history. Historical archaeology should aim to construct an unique history based on its own materials. Comparison and dialogue between textual history and historical archaeology occurs only at the general and middle-range level. Taking the perspective of historical archaeology, it reveals that triangle-rimed animal-motif mirrors had closely intellectual connections with Liaodong, reigned by Gongsun family for half a century and maintaining complicative relations with both Wei and Wu.
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
Zhipeng HE
. “Impossible Trinity for Great Powers” in International Rule of Law. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(6): 98-108.
-
[2]
Zhibiao LIU
. Regional Market Integration and Governance Mechanism Innovation in the Yangtze River Delta. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(10): 31-38.
-
[3]
Xueliang ZHANG
, Yang YANG
. Several Types of Relationships Need to Deal in the New Stage of Yangtze River Delta Integration. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(10): 39-45.
-
[4]
Jianjun CHEN
, Jie HUANG
. A Research on Yangtze River Delta Integrated Development Demonstration Zone: International Experience, Development Model and the Way to Realize. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(10): 46-53.
-
[5]
GAO Like
. Mirror of Society and Transcendental Reason: Comparison of Moral Philosophies between Smith and Kant. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(5): 26-35.
-
[6]
. . Academic Monthly,
2017, 49(03): 121-130.
-
[7]
WU Xiaoming
. Fundamental Difference between Chinese Philosophy and Western Philosophy: A Third Thesis. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(8): 5-26.
-
[8]
LIU Xiaojun
. On the Three Transformations of Chinese Classic Novel Comment in Modern Time. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(12): 136-145.
-
[9]
Qi YING
. Revisiting the Third Concept of Liberty. Academic Monthly,
2020, 52(8): 46-55.
-
[10]
LIANG Tao
. Mencius' Three Dimensions of the Distinction between Righteousness and Profit. Academic Monthly,
2024, 56(3): 37-43.
-
[11]
Weixiang DING
. Three Ideas of Knowing and Practicing in Confucianism of Song and Ming Dynasties. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(3): 5-16.
-
[12]
. . Academic Monthly,
2017, 49(08): 5-17.
-
[13]
Zongyi ZHENG
. On the Three Interpretations of Zhang Zai’s Philosophy ofQi. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(5): 29-38.
-
[14]
Rong LI
. Roland Barthes and the Language Practice of “the Third Generation Poetry”. Academic Monthly,
2020, 52(10): 130-140.
-
[15]
Zhongmin ZHANG
. The Debates on the Three Kinds of Construction of State Systems during the Hongxian Period. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(2): 194-204.
-
[16]
Bo XU
. Perfect Teaching: The Paradigmatic Transformation and Its Significance of Mou Zongsan Philosophy. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(9): 26-34.
-
[17]
TIAN Guoqiang
. Comparison of Moral Philosophies between Smith and Kant. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(5): 36-44.
-
[18]
. . Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(2): 1-1.
-
[19]
Xiaojun CHEN
. The Reform Policy of Farmland “Separation of Powers” Written into Law and Its Relieving Obstacles in Enforcement. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(1): 87-95.
-
[20]
. . Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(2): 137-1.
-
-