国家根本性议程与中国式治理民主

徐勇

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

November 2022

Article Contents

Citation: Yong XU. Fundamental Agenda of the State and Chinese Democracy of Government[J]. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(3): 101-109. shu

Fundamental Agenda of the State and Chinese Democracy of Government

Yong XU

Abstract

The concept of Chinese democracy of administration is a summarizing for the inner evolution of Chinese politics, and is decided by China’s fundamental issues and agenda of the state. Humans develop themselves in the process of solving the problems unceasingly. The fundamental issues of the state refers to those which are most important a state facing with in its progressing. The fundamental agenda refers to the most important task to achieving its target. The forms of democracy will be varied since the fundamental agenda varies from state to state. In ancient Greece, small state and small population gives birth to democratic system for city-states. As for the states with large land and population, a unity of public power becomes a fundamental issue for the state’s continuous development, thus monarchy becomes the fundamental agenda for the state to solve the issue of unity. In the system of monarchy, for permanent government and peace, there are democratic factors in the process of administration, resulting in the tenacity of China’s ancient monarchy system. Since the near modern times, the unity of the state has been facing with the greatest challenge, so the democratic system substitutes the monarchy. In new China, the socialist construction for modernization led by Chinese Communist Party becomes the fundamental agenda. Democracy is a must for the fundamental agenda, and the democratic factors in the traditional administration are promoted to a modern form of democracy of administration. It indivisibly includes two facades, i.e., firstly, the will of the people must be embodied in the whole process of state administration led by the Chinese Communist Party, and, secondly, the people’s democratic right is executed in laws by participating in the whole process of administration of the state with various forms. The fundamental agenda of the state has decided that China will not, and must not, adopt the western form of democracy in the way of political parties’ rotation through election.
- state,
- fundamental agenda,
- administration,
- democracy
References
Access
1. [1]
  Yao CHEN , Tiantian CHEN . How Systems Produce Governance Effciency: 70-Years Experience in China’s National Governance. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(2): 86-94.
2. [2]
  Xiangchen SUN . Hegel on the State and Religion. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(4): 17-30.
3. [3]
  Junnan LAI . Governance of Deed Tax at the Local Level of Qing’s Sichuan: with Particular Attention to Deed Tax Litigations in Nanbu County. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(10): 100-115.
4. [4]
  XIE Weiyang . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(8): 149-158.
5. [5]
  Weizhuo ZHANG . The Ethical Implication of Community: Ferdinand Tönnies’ Synthesis of Hegel’s and Marx’s View of the Relationship between State and Society. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(5): 134-145.
6. [6]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(03): 66-79.
7. [7]
  CHEN Baifeng . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(8): 93-103.
8. [8]
  LI Dianlai . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(8): 20-32.
9. [9]
  Baiyi WU , Yifei ZHANG . The Logic of State’s Return Phenomenon and the Dilemma of Global Governance. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(1): 80-92.
10. [10]
  Cheng GU , Guoning SUN . A New Look at International Tax Competition in Modern State Governance. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(1): 62-72.
11. [11]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(03): 81-90.
12. [12]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(08): 88-97.
13. [13]
  Shu TIAN . Moving the Capital to Beijing and the Governance of the Multi-ethnic Country of the Ming Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(12): 145-157.
14. [14]
  Zhaowang CHEN . Social Control and State Governance Realized by Welfare State. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(5): 82-94.
15. [15]
  Guangjun ZHOU . Ethnic Rights in the Evolution of the Nation State Community: Boundaries and Governance. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(9): 84-94.
16. [16]
  Zhenhua HUANG . Household Logic of National Governance: An Analytical Approach Based on Field Politics. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(7): 91-104, 178.
17. [17]
  Zhenghan CAO , Jing NIE , Xiaoming ZHANG . Centralization and Decentralization of Public Goods Provision in China: The Relations with State Governance. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(4): 69-83.
18. [18]
  Zhiming HAN . The Clarity and the Operational Logic of State Governance. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(9): 82-94.
19. [19]
  Shuaiyi WANG . Trial without Law: Land Disputes in Traditional Chinese Governance System. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(12): 106-120.
20. [20]
  Puqu WANG , Bin TANG . The Three Dimensions of Production Mechanism of National Governance Capacity. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(4): 65-72, 120.

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 341 Times PDF downloads: 1 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(1)
Abstract views(341)
HTML views(28)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Fundamental Agenda of the State and Chinese Democracy of Government

Yong XU

Available Online: 2022-03-20

Abstract: The concept of Chinese democracy of administration is a summarizing for the inner evolution of Chinese politics, and is decided by China’s fundamental issues and agenda of the state. Humans develop themselves in the process of solving the problems unceasingly. The fundamental issues of the state refers to those which are most important a state facing with in its progressing. The fundamental agenda refers to the most important task to achieving its target. The forms of democracy will be varied since the fundamental agenda varies from state to state. In ancient Greece, small state and small population gives birth to democratic system for city-states. As for the states with large land and population, a unity of public power becomes a fundamental issue for the state’s continuous development, thus monarchy becomes the fundamental agenda for the state to solve the issue of unity. In the system of monarchy, for permanent government and peace, there are democratic factors in the process of administration, resulting in the tenacity of China’s ancient monarchy system. Since the near modern times, the unity of the state has been facing with the greatest challenge, so the democratic system substitutes the monarchy. In new China, the socialist construction for modernization led by Chinese Communist Party becomes the fundamental agenda. Democracy is a must for the fundamental agenda, and the democratic factors in the traditional administration are promoted to a modern form of democracy of administration. It indivisibly includes two facades, i.e., firstly, the will of the people must be embodied in the whole process of state administration led by the Chinese Communist Party, and, secondly, the people’s democratic right is executed in laws by participating in the whole process of administration of the state with various forms. The fundamental agenda of the state has decided that China will not, and must not, adopt the western form of democracy in the way of political parties’ rotation through election.

HTML

Relative (20)

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Return

Fundamental Agenda of the State and Chinese Democracy of Government

Abstract

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Fundamental Agenda of the State and Chinese Democracy of Government

HTML

目录