Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 55 Issue 4
May 2023
Article Contents

Citation: Shuifa HAN. Hanese-Thought Order and Ancient System of Gods[J]. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(4): 45-71. shu

Hanese-Thought Order and Ancient System of Gods

  • The Hanese-thought order is a problematic, rich and fundamentally important area of research in the Hanese philosophy today, and it is also shown to be a fruitful method. Starting from this point and taking it as principle, the reexamination of ancient Hanese thought clarifies and recovers the spirit world of ancient Hanese, including its two main components, the system of gods and the system of mind. By analyzing and tracing the connections between the core words of the system of gods and their changes, the corresponding conceptual order and the changes of this order are sorted out, revealing the main structure of ancient Hanese thought and its major changes. Gu Jiegang denies that the system of gods was the fundamental factor and the main pillar of the social system throughout ancient Hanese thought because he lacks an effective method to clearly understand the binding nature of the Hanese-thought order; Yu Yingshi’s misjudgment of the relationship between humans and gods and the “eliminating the commonality between earth and heaven” in ancient Hanese is also due to his inappropriate methods and models that fail to comprehensively understand the direct connection between the word-thought-social order in ancient Hannese, and cannot pertinently grasp the ultimate intention of the systems of gods and mind in ancient Hanese.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      Lizhi HUANG . The Concept of Being Systematic Is the Fundamental Way of Thought and Work in the New Era. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(10): 5-16.

    2. [2]

      Zhen WU . On the Systematical Construction of Yangming’s Liangzhi Theory. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(1): 11-22.

    3. [3]

      Licheng QIAN . Memory Studies: Beyond the Nation State and Cosmopolitan Frameworks. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(11): 132-139.

    4. [4]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(09): 58-69.

    5. [5]

      YANG Guorong . Rituals as the Normative System—— Modern Significance of Classic Studies in The Rituals,Rituals of Zhou Dynasty,and The Book of Rituals. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(2): 33-44.

    6. [6]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(09): 99-109.

    7. [7]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(06): 121-131.

    8. [8]

      WEI Zhijiang . Study on the World Order of the Liao Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(12): 160-172.

    9. [9]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(06): 24-36.

    10. [10]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(01): 156-178.

    11. [11]

      WANG Yun . Lu Xun‘s Two Stances on Judging Artistic Justice. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(9): 131-141.

    12. [12]

      Gao Xinmin Hu Shuizhou . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(5): 25-35.

    13. [13]

      Yuan KONG . A Critical Study on the “Oriental” Paradox of Western Universal Narrative. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(1): 127-137.

    14. [14]

      XIE Huayu . Predicaments of Divided Urban Governance and Their Overcoming. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(11): 84-94.

    15. [15]

      Jilin XU . The Historical World and Spiritual Ethos of the Radical Intellectuals in Late Qing. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(5): 202-216.

    16. [16]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(06): 166-176.

    17. [17]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(05): 5-18.

    18. [18]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(12): 112-121.

    19. [19]

      TAO Nanying . Paradox in the Subjectivity Construction of Chinese Foreign-Related Legal Research and Its Transcendence. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(11): 95-109.

    20. [20]

      YU Jianxing . Beyond Technology Empowerment: How Can Governance Model Be Reshaped in Digital Reform. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(11): 73-83.

Article Metrics

Article views: 684 Times PDF downloads: 7 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(7)
  • Abstract views(684)
  • HTML views(180)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        Hanese-Thought Order and Ancient System of Gods

        Abstract: The Hanese-thought order is a problematic, rich and fundamentally important area of research in the Hanese philosophy today, and it is also shown to be a fruitful method. Starting from this point and taking it as principle, the reexamination of ancient Hanese thought clarifies and recovers the spirit world of ancient Hanese, including its two main components, the system of gods and the system of mind. By analyzing and tracing the connections between the core words of the system of gods and their changes, the corresponding conceptual order and the changes of this order are sorted out, revealing the main structure of ancient Hanese thought and its major changes. Gu Jiegang denies that the system of gods was the fundamental factor and the main pillar of the social system throughout ancient Hanese thought because he lacks an effective method to clearly understand the binding nature of the Hanese-thought order; Yu Yingshi’s misjudgment of the relationship between humans and gods and the “eliminating the commonality between earth and heaven” in ancient Hanese is also due to his inappropriate methods and models that fail to comprehensively understand the direct connection between the word-thought-social order in ancient Hannese, and cannot pertinently grasp the ultimate intention of the systems of gods and mind in ancient Hanese.

          HTML

        Relative (20)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return