Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 53 Issue 12
March 2022
Article Contents

Citation: Shiye TIAN and Ping LI. Changes of Rural Land Property Rights System in China from the Perspective of Development[J]. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(12): 74-84. shu

Changes of Rural Land Property Rights System in China from the Perspective of Development

  • Based on the macroscopical, historical and systematic Marxist property rights theory paradigm, we try to establish a development perspective to understand the changes of rural land property rights system in China.From this perspective, the change of rural land property rights system since the founding of new China is a process of institutional reconstruction to adapt to the historical change of agricultural and rural farmers’ function orientation. It is a process of adapting to China’s development stage, development mode and collective economic function transformation, and reshaping the relationship among the state, the collective and the farmers. It is an adaptive adjustment process for the dynamic evolution of the dual functions of rural land in the development process; and a systematic evolution process to realize the transformation from legal rights to economic rights through supporting reforms on the basis of development which includes the realization of rural land property rights. In the interpretation of development, the core view of western property rights theory, “the validity of private property rights” and “the invalidity of public property rights”, is essentially a highly ideological Western narrative, neither conforms to the socialist value orientation of common prosperity, nor objectively reveals the multidimensional and dynamic complex relation between property rights and development. These fundamental defects make it impossible for western property rights theory to deeply understand the real logic of China’s rural land property rights system changes and “Chinese-style modernization”. In order to tell a good “Chinese story” of reform and development, guided by the Marxist theory of property and combined with China’s own practice, we must strengthen the research on property rights from the perspective of development, and promote the innovative development of the socialist property rights theory with Chinese characteristics.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      Wenjing ZHONGBiliang LUO . The Asset Logic of Farmers Moving towards Common Prosperity. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(11): 38-53.

    2. [2]

      Guanghua WANWeirui JIANGJiehao ZHANG . Common Prosperity under the Changes Unseen in a Century: From a Perspective on Income Gap. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(8): 32-44.

    3. [3]

      Ming LU . For Long-term, Overall and Multidimensional Development: The Political Economy of China Road. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(3): 58-71, 109.

    4. [4]

      Jianyong FENG . The “Local” Pattern and the Meaning of “World” of Borderland. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(12): 166-175.

    5. [5]

      TIAN Guoqiang . Comparison of Moral Philosophies between Smith and Kant. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(5): 36-44.

    6. [6]

      Chunguang WANG . Rural Non-Employment Income and the Possible Future Picture of Chinese Rural Modernization. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(12): 128-140.

    7. [7]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(1): 208-216.

    8. [8]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(10): 123-130.

    9. [9]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(03): 48-56.

    10. [10]

      HAN Qingxiang . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(9): 5-14.

    11. [11]

      LIU Shouying . Open Access Order and the Common Prosperity for Rural People. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(8): 41-60.

    12. [12]

      Gonglong WANG . The Common Value of Human Being in Context of Karl Marx’s Theory of World History. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(7): 5-17.

    13. [13]

      ZHOU Pan . From Identity to Contract: Community Dilemma in the Reform of Collective Property Rights System. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(11): 123-135.

    14. [14]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(03): 57-65.

    15. [15]

      Xueyang CHENG . Rebuilding Land Property Rights: The Basic Experience and Direction of Land System Reform in China. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(4): 98-108.

    16. [16]

      Shuangli ZHANG . Rethinking Karl Marx’s Theory of Civil Society. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(9): 15-27.

    17. [17]

      Yun WANGYunbin ZHANG . Social Preference Theory: Controversy and Future Development. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(6): 72-86.

    18. [18]

      WEN Shi . . Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(6): 206-211.

    19. [19]

      Shipeng ZOU . Marx’s Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of State and Law and the Basic Orientation of State Socialization. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(6): 19-30.

    20. [20]

      Jinlong XIAO . A Glimpse into the Trend of Western Current Event Theory. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(10): 154-161.

Article Metrics

Article views: 776 Times PDF downloads: 9 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(9)
  • Abstract views(776)
  • HTML views(118)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        Changes of Rural Land Property Rights System in China from the Perspective of Development

        Abstract: Based on the macroscopical, historical and systematic Marxist property rights theory paradigm, we try to establish a development perspective to understand the changes of rural land property rights system in China.From this perspective, the change of rural land property rights system since the founding of new China is a process of institutional reconstruction to adapt to the historical change of agricultural and rural farmers’ function orientation. It is a process of adapting to China’s development stage, development mode and collective economic function transformation, and reshaping the relationship among the state, the collective and the farmers. It is an adaptive adjustment process for the dynamic evolution of the dual functions of rural land in the development process; and a systematic evolution process to realize the transformation from legal rights to economic rights through supporting reforms on the basis of development which includes the realization of rural land property rights. In the interpretation of development, the core view of western property rights theory, “the validity of private property rights” and “the invalidity of public property rights”, is essentially a highly ideological Western narrative, neither conforms to the socialist value orientation of common prosperity, nor objectively reveals the multidimensional and dynamic complex relation between property rights and development. These fundamental defects make it impossible for western property rights theory to deeply understand the real logic of China’s rural land property rights system changes and “Chinese-style modernization”. In order to tell a good “Chinese story” of reform and development, guided by the Marxist theory of property and combined with China’s own practice, we must strengthen the research on property rights from the perspective of development, and promote the innovative development of the socialist property rights theory with Chinese characteristics.

          HTML

        Relative (20)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return