经济学话语与历史唯物主义发生学（笔谈）
Economic Discourse and the Formation of Historical Materialism (Symposium)
-
摘要: 张一兵认为，《布鲁塞尔笔记》和《曼彻斯特笔记》是马克思第二次系统研究经济学的重要笔记，也是广义历史唯物主义诞生之前夜的经济学思想实验。理解这一文本群的写作过程和理论内涵，对于认识广义历史唯物主义的形成具有十分重要的意义。张福公通过对《布鲁塞尔笔记》的研究，提出机器大工业所彰显的生产方式历史性变革构成了马克思从哲学人本学话语转向从客观现实出发的物质生产话语的内在动机之一。基于MEGA2对《布鲁塞尔笔记》的深入文本解读，将有助于我们深刻把握马克思哲学革命的思想渊源与生成逻辑。孔伟宇认为，《布鲁塞尔笔记》是马克思生产话语出场的重要“案发现场”：一是宣布了马克思劳动话语的退场与生产话语的转换；二是促使马克思认识到物质生产作为基础和前提的重要作用；三是构建了马克思广义历史唯物主义从关系性生产透视社会历史整体发展的方法论基础。吴婷认为，在《曼彻斯特笔记》中，马克思继续关注了资产阶级的物质生产过程，并认识到现代工业体系下的物质生产不仅创造了人与自然一种新的历史性关系，同时也使人的社会关系及其结构发生根本变化。这种从现实出发的“生产话语”终结了此前的人本主义价值批判逻辑，成为把握马克思新世界观来源的重要理论线索。Abstract: Zhang Yibing holds that the Brussels Notes and Manchester Notes are Karl Marx’s important notes of his second systematic study on economics, and they are also the experiments of economic thought at the eve of the birth of historical materialism on a broad sense. But in the past days’ studies we did not lay sufficient importance on these texts, and the translation is also scarce. It is of important significance for understanding the formation of the broad-sense historical materialism through understanding these texts’ writing process and their theoretical connotation. Zhang Fugong proposes, through his study on Brussels Notes, that the historical revolution of the mode of production evinced by large-scale machine industry constituted one of the inner motives of Karl Marx’s turn from philosophical-humanistic discourse to the discourse of material production starting from objective reality. A deeper text-reading based on MEGA2 to Brussels Notes will be helpful for us to deeply understand the ideological origin and formation logic of Marx’s philosophical revolution. Kong Weiyu believes that Brussels Notes is the important spot of Marx’s discourse of production. Firstly, it announced his retreat from the discourse of labor and transfer to the discourse of production; Secondly, it made Marx to see the important function of material production as basis and premise; Thirdly, it constructed the foundation of methodology to penetrate the wholesome development of social history through relationship production in his broad-sense historical materialism. Wu Ting proposes that Marx in his Manchester Notes continuously concerned with the bourgeois material production process, and he acknowledged that, in the system of modern industry, the material production not only created a new historical relation between humans and the nature, but also created fundamental change in human social relation and its structure. Such a “production discourse” starting from reality put an end to the prior humanistic logic of value critique, and becomes an important clue to grasp Marx’s new source of world view.
-
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 318
- HTML全文浏览量: 22
下载:
沪公网安备 31010102003103号