Citation:
Shizong WANG and Fan YANG. Grassroots Governance Research: Reflections, Consensus and Prospects[J]. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(7): 80-92.
Grassroots Governance Research: Reflections, Consensus and Prospects
-
Abstract
As an important area of social science, grassroots governance, which becomes the nexus of state-society relations, hierarchical relations, and micro behaviors in the social sphere, is a rich deposit for interpreting China’s governance logics and attracts plenty of scholars from different fields. Due to the characteristics of both research paradigm and scholars, this field is saturated by diversified topics, methodology controversies, and competing perspectives. The research of grassroots governance pursues causal and explanatory knowledge. The academic community of grassroots governance should reach the consensus on the question formation, the analytical factors design and the methods selection based on shared macro-theories, middle-level concepts and micro-empirical propositions, exploring common mechanisms that can be embedded in the vein of the field. In the future, the local and competing mechanisms may provide factors for the academic community to further explore the general and consistent knowledge. The emergence of computational social science is expected to promote the paradigm shift, and the “general principles” of grassroots governance will most likely appear in an unprecedented form. Devoting to the paradigm shift is the academic obligation for Chinese scholars to the modernize national governance and pursue the autonomy of the social science.
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
XIE Yu，ZHU Ying
. . Academic Monthly,
2024, 56(3): 212-216.
-
[2]
Xin HE
. Study on Law with Experience:Based on External Perspectives of Social Sciences. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(3): 106-113.
-
[3]
,
. . Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(1): 211-216.
-
[4]
Leizhen ZANG
, Yifei ZHU
. Process and Context: A Social Science Causal Approach. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(4): 33-44.
-
[5]
. . Academic Monthly,
2017, 49(08): 5-17.
-
[6]
Xuewei ZHAI
. Cross-culture, Translation and Indigenization of Social Sciences. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(5): 128-140.
-
[7]
Jinzhao CHEN
. The Construction Significance of Jurisprudence to Chinese Philosophy and Social Science System. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(4): 106-120.
-
[8]
. . Academic Monthly,
2016, 48(02): 66-75.
-
[9]
Jiantao REN
. Calling the Soul of Theory: The Perspective of Social Sciences Examining “the Modern”. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(4): 5-16.
-
[10]
Jianxing YU
, Jie REN
. Self-governance, Rule of Law, Rule of Virtue and Their Combination in Community-level Social Governance. Academic Monthly,
2018, 50(12): 64-74.
-
[11]
. . Academic Monthly,
2016, 48(04): 5-10.
-
[12]
. . Academic Monthly,
2016, 48(09): 13-14.
-
[13]
Mingke SHENG
, Yong LIU
. How Burnout of Grassroots Bureaucracy be Generated. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(4): 114-126.
-
[14]
XIAO Ying
. Family/Home and Social Governance: Values,Methods,Objects and Subjects. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(7): 115-127.
-
[15]
Yipeng TIAN
. The Transformation of Community Grid Management and the Upgrade of Grassroots Governance. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(3): 125-132.
-
[16]
Yingjin XU
. A Dialogue between Sosa’s Virtue Epistemology and a Confucian Theory of the Rectification of Names. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(12): 13-23.
-
[17]
. . Academic Monthly,
2016, 48(01): 49-66.
-
[18]
WU Xiaolin
. Historical Tradition and Modernization of Urban Primary Governance in China. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(9): 77-89.
-
[19]
Weili LI
. Neo-Danweism: the Nexus Politics in Contemporary Chinese Grassroots Governance Structure. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(8): 78-88.
-
[20]
Yalin TANG
, Kun QIAN
. “Refinding Residents”: Experts’ Intervening and Reengineering Endogenous Impetus of Innovating Urban Grassroots Governance Model. Academic Monthly,
2020, 52(1): 84-96.
-
-
沪公网安备 31010102003103号
DownLoad: