Citation:
Xuan SHI. Rationalist Theory of Happiness: The Core Elements of Descartes’ Ethics and Its Influence[J]. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(7): 35-42.
Rationalist Theory of Happiness: The Core Elements of Descartes’ Ethics and Its Influence
-
Abstract
Descartes’ ethics is a set of ethical theory based on the rationalist epistemology with the purpose of achieving human happiness, which is mainly composed of the three core elements: human reason, free will and habitual connection between body and mind. From the perspective of contemporary Western ethics, on the one hand, Descartes’ ethics contains the value theory which does not belong to the theory of interest or hedonism but to the perfectionism; on the other hand, it also contains the action theory which explains the appropriate actions. The three most influential theories in contemporary Western ethics are utilitarianism, deontology and moralism. Descartes’ ethics does not belong to any of them. It belongs to the tradition of Western classical happiness theory, to be more precise, it is a rationalist theory of happiness. Compared with the later ethical theories, Descartes’ ethics is quite simple. However, human reason as its core element is the starting point of modern thinking, which has profoundly influenced and even shaped the entire Western modern philosophy. It influenced the world and will continue to influence the world. That’s why it is still worth thinking about it.
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
ZHOU Ye’an
. . Academic Monthly,
2018, 50(8): 33-41.
-
[2]
Shaobin BIAN
. Leave the State of Nature: Kant and Justification on the Idea of Public Right. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(6): 13-31.
-
[3]
Jian’guo JIANG
. The Geography of Newspapers, News Presentation and the Reader’s Response during the Sino-Japanese War Period. Academic Monthly,
2018, 50(12): 153-165.
-
[4]
Siwen LEI
. To the Things Themselves. Academic Monthly,
2020, 52(12): 14-22.
-
[5]
Ying XIA
. On the Bi-attributes of Enlightenment Philosophy and Marx’s Liberation Logic. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(10): 17-29.
-
[6]
Li LI
. Imaginative Rationality. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(10): 150-159.
-
[7]
. . Academic Monthly,
2017, 49(08): 18-29.
-
[8]
Liang GUO
. The Order outside of the Law: “Habitual Interests” in Land and Its Governance. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(7): 107-116.
-
[9]
Xing NAN
. Do Artificial Agents Have Free Will?. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(1): 35-47.
-
[10]
Yidong WEI
, Shengguo WU
. The Solution of “the Problem of Free Will” in Theory of Contextual Identity. Academic Monthly,
2018, 50(11): 18-27.
-
[11]
Ruiquan GAO
. The Obscure and the Conspicuous: The Concept of Free Will in the Course of Development of Monism of Mind. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(11): 5-16.
-
[12]
. On the Irrationality of False Pretence. Academic Monthly,
2018, 50(04): 21-32.
-
[13]
SUN Wanhuai
. Is Free Will the Rational Basis of Responsibilitism. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(8): 106-122.
-
[14]
. . Academic Monthly,
2016, 48(07): 66-78.
-
[15]
Mingjun ZHANG
. Instrumental Rationality and the Form of Liberal Political Romanticism. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(12): 85-95.
-
[16]
Xiaoling SUN
. Moral Disagreements and Constructivism’s Conception of Practical Reason. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(11): 30-37, 83.
-
[17]
Ke MENG
, Chang LU
. Substantive Rationality and the Formation of Weberian Bureaucracy. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(3): 140-150, 161.
-
[18]
. . Academic Monthly,
2016, 48(03): 48-56.
-
[19]
. . Academic Monthly,
2016, 48(09): 5-7.
-
[20]
Xiaoming CHEN
. On the Aesthetic Connotation of “New Rational Spirit”. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(11): 148-159.
-
-
沪公网安备 31010102003103号
DownLoad: