Citation:
Peng ZHAO and Yaowen XIE. The Ethical Dimension of Science-Technology Governance and Its Legalization[J]. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(8): 91-104.
The Ethical Dimension of Science-Technology Governance and Its Legalization
-
Abstract
The governance system of the science and technology has changed from focusing on “physical impact” to “value impact”, which has triggered an ethical governance shift. At present, the ethical governance structure of science and technology is far from mature. The normative basis of ethical governance of science and technology, the relationship between ethics of science and technology and law, and the way in which law intervenes in ethical governance need to be clarified. The normative basis for the development of ethical governance is that, with the evolution of the “science-technology-society” relationship, the law should not simply understand science and technology as a neutral tool but need to face up to its value-loaded attributes. The development of new and emerging science and technology requires appropriate legal intervention to establish an orderly reflection process and form behavioral guidelines, which ultimately promotes the orderly dialogue and connection between the science-technology system and the social system. The specific path includes institutionalizing ethical deliberation procedures, improving the multi-level behavior guidance system, and constructing a self-regulatory system which is subjected to the state regulation.
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
XIAO Ying
. Family/Home and Social Governance: Values,Methods,Objects and Subjects. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(7): 115-127.
-
[2]
Jianxing YU
, Jie REN
. Self-governance, Rule of Law, Rule of Virtue and Their Combination in Community-level Social Governance. Academic Monthly,
2018, 50(12): 64-74.
-
[3]
Tianyu QIAO
, Jinglin XIANG
. The Underlying Logics of Digital Transformation of Social Governance. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(2): 131-139.
-
[4]
Yi ZHOU
. Thick and Thin: Traditional Chinese Values and Concepts in Globalization. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(10): 120-133.
-
[5]
Huiying FANG
. The Value Orientation and Standardized Construction of the Principle of Modesty in Criminal Law. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(7): 117-125.
-
[6]
Yipeng TIAN
. The Transformation of Community Grid Management and the Upgrade of Grassroots Governance. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(3): 125-132.
-
[7]
Jianyong FENG
. “Diplomatizing” the Border Governance. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(2): 186-198.
-
[8]
Qiliang WANG
. Social Foundation of Rule by Law. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(10): 110-120.
-
[9]
YAO Zelin
. Professional Ethics in Sociology: The Origins of the Concept and the Reality in Contemporary China. Academic Monthly,
2024, 56(1): 127-140.
-
[10]
Shaoping GAN
. The Hierarchical Structure and Ethical Dimension of Privacy. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(12): 5-14.
-
[11]
Mingjun ZHANG
, Youhua ZHAO
. The Logic of Institutional Maturity and Modernization of Governance Capacity. Academic Monthly,
2020, 52(8): 99-112, 128.
-
[12]
WU Xiaolin
. Historical Tradition and Modernization of Urban Primary Governance in China. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(9): 77-89.
-
[13]
Zhiming HAN
. The Clarity and the Operational Logic of State Governance. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(9): 82-94.
-
[14]
Zhibiao LIU
. Regional Market Integration and Governance Mechanism Innovation in the Yangtze River Delta. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(10): 31-38.
-
[15]
,
. . Academic Monthly,
2017, 49(12): 103-111.
-
[16]
Weilai DAI
. Global Governance amid the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Fragmentation and the Role of Middle Powers. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(4): 92-103.
-
[17]
Yawen CHEN
. Civic Virtues and Ethical Virtues: A Hint from the Ethics of Caring. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(7): 22-30.
-
[18]
. . Academic Monthly,
2017, 49(07): 165-179.
-
[19]
. . Academic Monthly,
2017, 49(02): 25-33.
-
[20]
. . Academic Monthly,
2017, 49(03): 40-47.
-
-
沪公网安备 31010102003103号
DownLoad: