Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 53 Issue 6
September 2021
Article Contents

Citation: Shipeng ZOU. Marx’s Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of State and Law and the Basic Orientation of State Socialization[J]. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(6): 19-30. shu

Marx’s Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of State and Law and the Basic Orientation of State Socialization

  • Unlike identifying the starting point of Marx’s socio-political theory as the German Ideology, Doctoral Thesis, or Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844, this paper identifies the starting point of Marx’s socio-political theory as Critique of Hegel’s ‘Philosophy of Right’ and Towards a Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right: Introduction, and On the Jewish Question in the period of German-French Yearbook. In these documents, Marx realized the transition from enlightenment liberalism to radicalism. By following Feuerbach’s subject-predicate inversion logic, Marx reversed Hegel’s “state determines civil society” into “civil society determines the state”. However, Marx did not stop at the ready-made judgment that “civil society determines the state”, but explored the historical sublation of civil society and mapped out the possible forms of the state respectively. Marx’s civil society is obviously not the ready-made egoistic civil society of the young Hegelians and Feuerbach, but as a historically existing bourgeois society, which becomes the object of criticism of political economy in the process of the promotion and transformation of human society, thus achieving the historical materialism. Through the criticism of Hegel’s rational state or ethical state, Marx also tried to realize the transformation from the material or bourgeois state to the people’s state. But the people’s state is different from an anarchist and populist state, but a social community associated with the construction of a new society. The socialization of the state is the basic theoretical orientation that has been given in Marx’s critique of Hegel’s philosophy of state and law.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      Shuangli ZHANG . Rethinking Karl Marx’s Theory of Civil Society. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(9): 15-27.

    2. [2]

      Zhouxing SUN . Karl Marx’s Critique of Technology and the Future Society. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(6): 5-12.

    3. [3]

      Weizhuo ZHANG . The Ethical Implication of Community: Ferdinand Tönnies’ Synthesis of Hegel’s and Marx’s View of the Relationship between State and Society. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(5): 134-145.

    4. [4]

      LI Dianlai . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(8): 20-32.

    5. [5]

      Liang SUN . Reconstruction of the Concept of Sociality in the Context of Critique of Political Economy. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(4): 14-21.

    6. [6]

      Lixin HAN . The Contemporary Significance of Study on Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(4): 5-16.

    7. [7]

      bo FANG . Marx and German Romanticism. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(2): 15-26.

    8. [8]

      ZHANG Yibin . Exchange-Value: From the Usefulness of “For People”to the Equivalence of “For Money”— A Reexamination of Marx’s Economic Manuscripts 1857-1858. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(5): 5-16.

    9. [9]

      Yibing ZHANG . Back to Marx: Civil Society and Alienation of Labor in the Ontology of Scocial Gestalt. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(9): 17-27.

    10. [10]

      Li LI . Imaginative Rationality. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(10): 150-159.

    11. [11]

      Jiaxin ZHOU . How did Young Marx Criticize Hegel. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(8): 16-24.

    12. [12]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(08): 166-178.

    13. [13]

      Ping HE . New Culture Movement and the Opening of Sinicization of Marxist Philosophy. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(1): 11-24.

    14. [14]

      Xiangchen SUN . Hegel on the State and Religion. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(4): 17-30.

    15. [15]

      WEN Shi . . Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(6): 206-211.

    16. [16]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(04): 15-27.

    17. [17]

      . A Depoliticized Program of Political Philosophy. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(03): 57-65.

    18. [18]

      Ying XIA . On the Bi-attributes of Enlightenment Philosophy and Marx’s Liberation Logic. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(10): 17-29.

    19. [19]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(11): 28-47.

    20. [20]

      HAN Qingxiang . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(9): 5-14.

Article Metrics

Article views: 1321 Times PDF downloads: 3 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(3)
  • Abstract views(1321)
  • HTML views(175)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        Marx’s Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of State and Law and the Basic Orientation of State Socialization

        • School of Philosophy, Fudan University Center for Contemporary Marxism in Foreign Countries of Fudan University

        Abstract: Unlike identifying the starting point of Marx’s socio-political theory as the German Ideology, Doctoral Thesis, or Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844, this paper identifies the starting point of Marx’s socio-political theory as Critique of Hegel’s ‘Philosophy of Right’ and Towards a Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right: Introduction, and On the Jewish Question in the period of German-French Yearbook. In these documents, Marx realized the transition from enlightenment liberalism to radicalism. By following Feuerbach’s subject-predicate inversion logic, Marx reversed Hegel’s “state determines civil society” into “civil society determines the state”. However, Marx did not stop at the ready-made judgment that “civil society determines the state”, but explored the historical sublation of civil society and mapped out the possible forms of the state respectively. Marx’s civil society is obviously not the ready-made egoistic civil society of the young Hegelians and Feuerbach, but as a historically existing bourgeois society, which becomes the object of criticism of political economy in the process of the promotion and transformation of human society, thus achieving the historical materialism. Through the criticism of Hegel’s rational state or ethical state, Marx also tried to realize the transformation from the material or bourgeois state to the people’s state. But the people’s state is different from an anarchist and populist state, but a social community associated with the construction of a new society. The socialization of the state is the basic theoretical orientation that has been given in Marx’s critique of Hegel’s philosophy of state and law.

          HTML

        Relative (20)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return