Citation:
Jian WEI. Large-scale Reallocation of Factors and the Lubrication of Public Ownership[J]. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(4): 45-54.
Large-scale Reallocation of Factors and the Lubrication of Public Ownership
-
Abstract
After 40 years’ development, China has been the second largest economy. It has successfully achieved a long and high-speed economic growth by pushing labor and land factors from the agricultural field into the process of industrialization and urbanization. However, in terms of history and international experience, growth factors are often locked in the agricultural sector before economic take-off. How are the factors reallocated on a large scale in China? Socialist public ownership provides institutional basis and strong support for the reallocation of factors and even for the rapid industrialization process in China. Land public ownership not only provides flexible guarantee for farmers to transform into migrant workers, but also provides flexible space for non-agricultural use of land. The role of public ownership shows that the economic take-off can only be achieved through the corresponding institutional arrangements to promote the smooth reallocation of factors, and the effective use of property rights in the take-off process may be more important than the protection of property rights. Furthermore, public ownership does not necessarily represent the bottom of resource utilization efficiency, and the key lies in the construction of effective governance mechanism. Public ownership constitutes the institutional and material basis of social equality, and the competition and innovation on it will be more powerful, which is the essence of the socialist market economy.
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
Guoqiang TIAN
. Policy Coordination and Reform Response for China’s High-quality Economic Development. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(5): 32-38.
-
[2]
TIAN Guoqiang
. Comparison of Moral Philosophies between Smith and Kant. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(5): 36-44.
-
[3]
Guoqiang TIAN
, Xudong CHEN
. How to Pursue Progress while Maintaining Stability and Promote High-quality Development for China’s Economy. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(6): 34-46.
-
[4]
Jing GE
, Ruiming LIU
. China’s Economic Growth, Fluctuation and Regional Disparities. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(2): 63-78.
-
[5]
Yonggang HU
, Xudong CHEN
. The New Period of China’s Economic Growth and the Shifts in Policy Focus. Academic Monthly,
2020, 52(10): 53-61.
-
[6]
Zhiqing DONG
, Hui WANG
. Urbanization, Economic Agglomeration and Heterogeneity of Regional Economic Growth. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(10): 54-66.
-
[7]
Dapeng ZHOU
. Entrepreneurship and Schumpeterian Growth and Transformation of China’s Economy. Academic Monthly,
2020, 52(7): 57-68.
-
[8]
Wei WANG
, Yufei LIU
, Qing SHI
. Population Aging、Urbanization and China’s Economic Growth. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(1): 68-82.
-
[9]
Biliang LUO
. Growth, Transformation and Ecological Development. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(5): 54-64.
-
[10]
Wei MAO
. Economic Performance of Institutional Change. Academic Monthly,
2020, 52(5): 62-71.
-
[11]
Yucheng SANG
, Tianhang MA
. Forty Years of Chinese Political Science: Agenda Setting and Political Development. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(12): 60-70.
-
[12]
Shao’an HUANG
. Major Economic Theory Innovations afterChina’s Reform and Opening-up. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(3): 39-47.
-
[13]
. . Academic Monthly,
2017, 49(02): 80-95.
-
[14]
,
. Urban-Rural Relationship since the Reform and Opening up: Historical Context, Phase Characteristics and Future Prospects. Academic Monthly,
2018, 50(04): 58-68.
-
[15]
,
. . Academic Monthly,
2017, 49(12): 78-89.
-
[16]
. . Academic Monthly,
2016, 48(04): 54-62.
-
[17]
CHEN Kunting
. What is the Impact of Capital Structure on Long-term Economic Growth——基于中国省际面板数据的门槛回归分析. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(11): 52-62.
-
[18]
. . Academic Monthly,
2017, 49(01): 42-56.
-
[19]
. . Academic Monthly,
2017, 49(07): 35-44.
-
[20]
,
. . Academic Monthly,
2016, 48(01): 87-100.
-
-
沪公网安备 31010102003103号
DownLoad:
