Citation:
Yajun CHEN. Normativity, Inference, Communication, and World[J]. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(5): 5-14.
Normativity, Inference, Communication, and World
-
Abstract
Robert Brandom takes " normativity” as the unique feature of human’s practice, and explains the nature of normativity in the pragmatic way; then, based on normativity, he introduces inference as the solution to the meaning of language and derives the material inference as the fundamental layer; then, he clarifies the actual operative mechanism of inference in great detail which is realized in the the course of social communications, regarding the process of social-communication to be essentially the deontic scorekeeping among different individuals; finally, under the framework of inferentialism, he argues for the necessity of vocabulary such as " truth” and " representation” and makes an inferentialist explanation about the relation between language and world. His philosophical system is composed of these four dimensions: normativity, inference, communication and world. They form an integrated whole made of a fine structure. By doing so he unifies many originally different or even opposite viewpoints.
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
Liangkang NI
. Husserl and Patocka’s Life-world. Academic Monthly,
2020, 52(2): 5-19.
-
[2]
Jinhua CHENG
. Normalization of Facts in the Legal System. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(3): 114-124.
-
[3]
Yinxing HONG
. Capital in Socialist Market Economy: Attributes, Acts, and Norms. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(5): 39-45.
-
[4]
Yajun CHEN
. How the Myth of the Given is Collapsed by Pittsburgh School. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(1): 20-30.
-
[5]
Guorong YANG
. Human Knowing: An Understanding in Broad Sense. Academic Monthly,
2020, 52(3): 15-25.
-
[6]
. . Academic Monthly,
2020, 52(1): 17-20.
-
[7]
Shaojie LIU
. The Communication Practice and Development Logic of Network Society in China. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(8): 105-117.
-
[8]
,
. . Academic Monthly,
2020, 52(2): 176-184.
-
[9]
. Towards the Concrete World. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(2): 5-15.
-
[10]
Yuanbao GAO
. Lu Xun Belongs to the World More Than to East Asia. Academic Monthly,
2020, 52(1): 121-141.
-
[11]
Qingxiong ZHANG
. The Social Function of Public Interpretation and Its Intersubjective Communication Mode with Critical Dimension. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(11): 24-30.
-
[12]
Rong MA
. “Barbarian” Domination in the Core Area in the History of Cultural and Political Interactions in China. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(2): 167-175.
-
[13]
,
,
. . Academic Monthly,
2017, 49(01): 177-178.
-
[14]
WEI Zhijiang
. Study on the World Order of the Liao Dynasty. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(12): 160-172.
-
[15]
TAO Dongfeng
. An Analysis of Hannah Arendt’s Concept of the “World”. Academic Monthly,
2024, 56(2): 115-123.
-
[16]
Jianyong FENG
. The “Local” Pattern and the Meaning of “World” of Borderland. Academic Monthly,
2018, 50(12): 166-175.
-
[17]
Xuequan PANG
. Reconstruction of the Daily Life Experience World. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(1): 23-34.
-
[18]
Xin DAI
. “The Pretense of Not Knowing”: A Basic Privacy Norm. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(4): 104-117.
-
[19]
Meng HOU
. Paradigm of Empirical Legal Research: Compared with Normative Legal Research. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(3): 99-105.
-
[20]
Chunzhen GUO
, Haiyang WANG
. Normative Structure of the Right to Erasure in Personal Information Protection. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(10): 92-106.
-
-