Citation:
Rongjun YANG. The Action Logic, Breeding Situation and Governance of Populism in Cyberspace[J]. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(8): 79-91.
The Action Logic, Breeding Situation and Governance of Populism in Cyberspace
-
Abstract
In cyberspace, as a complex social phenomenon, populism is a social trend of thought, a political strategy and a social movement as well. Generally speaking, the action logic of populism in cyberspace follows the law of “social trend of thought → political strategy → social movement”, and its process is shown as “public opinion fermenting → public opinion denouncing → public resentment boiling → network mobilization → network spillover”. In current china, the breeding situation of populism in cyberspace is complex. It is the product of the interaction of social, psychological and political factors. To a certain extent, although populism in cyberspace has the social function of warning, it also has the harm of impacting the mainstream ideology, stirring up the social contradictions, destroying the social order and so on. Therefore, in the foundation of paying attention to social justice and people-centered and starting from the breeding situation of populism in cyberspace, we should follow the logic of technology interruption, system construction, identity construction and root cause governance to effectively control its harm.
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
Xin DAI
. Rediscovering Social Norms: A Economic Sociological Perspective of Cyberlaw in China. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(2): 109-123.
-
[2]
Shaojie LIU
. The Communication Practice and Development Logic of Network Society in China. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(8): 105-117.
-
[3]
. . Academic Monthly,
2017, 49(05): 74-89.
-
[4]
. . Academic Monthly,
2017, 49(09): 119-130.
-
[5]
. . Academic Monthly,
2017, 49(07): 68-77.
-
[6]
JIAO Jianhua
. Chinese Transnational Business Networks and Development in Modern Xiamen—— Focus on the Qiaopi Network in Southern Fujian Province. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(11): 189-197.
-
[7]
Chusheng YE
, Zhaoke REN
. The Network Analysis in Economics and the Economic Research of the Network. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(5): 39-46, 38.
-
[8]
ZHAO Shuai
. The Founding of The New China and Its “Newspaper-politic Network”. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(12): 173-190.
-
[9]
. . Academic Monthly,
2016, 48(01): 38-48.
-
[10]
Yuefei WU
. Towards Mobility Governance: Theoretical Reconstruction of New Regional Space and Its Action Strategies. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(2): 86-95.
-
[11]
Mingke SHENG
, Yong LIU
. How Burnout of Grassroots Bureaucracy be Generated. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(4): 114-126.
-
[12]
Xuefeng HE
, Hua GUI
. Administrative Incentives and the Logic of Rural Governance. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(7): 126-137.
-
[13]
CHENG Dazhong
. The Value Chain Network Basis of China‘s Belt and Road Initiative. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(9): 31-42.
-
[14]
Zhenru WU
. New Research Paradigm in Applied Economics: the Scale-free Network and the Product Space. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(5): 47-57.
-
[15]
Xianliang FENG
. People as the Core of Clan: The Kingship Network and Political Changes of the Qian’s Family in Weitang During the Transition Period from Ming to Qing Dynasties. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(7): 149-163.
-
[16]
Da’an HE
. Network Cooperation in Investment and Management of Enterprises in the Internet Age. Academic Monthly,
2020, 52(11): 32-40.
-
[17]
Baiyi WU
, Yifei ZHANG
. The Logic of State’s Return Phenomenon and the Dilemma of Global Governance. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(1): 80-92.
-
[18]
Tianyu QIAO
, Jinglin XIANG
. The Underlying Logics of Digital Transformation of Social Governance. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(2): 131-139.
-
[19]
Yongle ZHANG
. Concert of Powers and the Grand Compromise: The Network of Treaties, the Banking Consortium and the Path of the 1911 Revolution. Academic Monthly,
2018, 50(10): 91-109.
-
[20]
GUO Liandong
. Global Translations for Genre Fictions —— Taking Crime Fictions, Web Fictions, and Science Fictions as Examples. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(11): 160-168.
-
-