阐释学视域下黑格尔“艺术终结论”的再审视

朱立元

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

November 2022

Article Contents

Citation: Liyuan ZHU. Re-examination of Hegel’s “The End of Art” in the Perspective of Hermeneutics[J]. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(2): 140-157. shu

Re-examination of Hegel’s “The End of Art” in the Perspective of Hermeneutics

Liyuan ZHU

Abstract

“The end of art” has always been the focus of academic circles, but most researchers agree that Hegel first proposed the thesis. Based on the perspective of hermeneutics, the paper explores whether the author’s original meaning has a certain legitimacy when interpreting a particular text. Heidegger and Gadamer, two representative figures of ontological hermeneutics, respectively sum up Hegel’s aesthetics with the thesis of “great art comes to an end” and “the past character of art”. The Paper compares Hegel’s text with Heidegger and Gadamer’s interpretation of Hegel, and analyses in detail, finds that Hegel himself has not put forward the thesis of “the end of art”. Although Heidegger and Gadamer’s interpretation of Hegel rely on the framework of ontological hermeneutics and creatively explain their understanding, they try to fit the original meaning of Hegel’s textin concrete analysis. This particular hermeneutic phenomenon means that the claim of methodological hermeneutics to seek the author’s original meaning is not entirely obsolete, it can complement ontological hermeneutics under certain conditions.
- Hegel,
- “the end of art”,
- methodological hermeneutics,
- ontological hermeneutics,
- Heidegger “great art comes to an end”,
- Gadamer “the past character of art”
References
Access
1. [1]
  Xiaoming WU . On Hegel’s Critique to Formalist Academy. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(2): 5-16.
2. [2]
  Gang XIAN . On the System and Dual Structure of Schelling’s Philosophy of Art. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(12): 5-13.
3. [3]
  Xiaozhou HUANG . The Legacy of Hegel: On the Horizon of Gadamer’s Hermeneutics. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(12): 31-44.
4. [4]
  Xiangchen SUN . Hegel on the State and Religion. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(4): 17-30.
5. [5]
  Xianliang XU . From “the Journey of Discovery of Consciousness” to “the Odyssey of Spirit”. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(6): 167-178.
6. [6]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(09): 51-57.
7. [7]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(10): 35-45.
8. [8]
  Qingjie WANG . Is Heidegger’s Fundamental Ontology A Philosophical Anthropology?. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(8): 5-12.
9. [9]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(07): 25-34.
10. [10]
  GU Pengfei . On Hermeneutics of AI Art. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(6): 150-159.
11. [11]
  Naiqiao YANG . The Multi-interlingual Translation from “Vernehmen” to “觉知”: On the Deconstruction of the Transcendental Meaning of Metaphysics by Martin Heidegger’s Ontological Hermeneutics. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(3): 162-176.
12. [12]
  Lixin HAN . The Contemporary Significance of Study on Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(4): 5-16.
13. [13]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(12): 69-77.
14. [14]
  Ruicheng HUANG , Xin ZHANG , Gengli MAHE . Historical Debates of Leo Strauss’s Political Philosophy and Martin Heidegger’s Philosophy of Being. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(6): 85-97.
15. [15]
  Wenfang YAO . The Poetic Model/Hermeneutic Model: The Interpretation Approach to Productive Literary Criticism. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(9): 159-170.
16. [16]
  Jiaxin ZHOU . How did Young Marx Criticize Hegel. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(8): 16-24.
17. [17]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(04): 15-27.
18. [18]
  Weizhuo ZHANG . The Ethical Implication of Community: Ferdinand Tönnies’ Synthesis of Hegel’s and Marx’s View of the Relationship between State and Society. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(5): 134-145.
19. [19]
  Taihui GUO . Sources of Methodological Differentiation Within Historical Sociology. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(12): 81-94.
20. [20]
  Shengxun SHI . Art Theory Towards Practical Interpretation. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(9): 148-158.

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 301 Times PDF downloads: 0 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(0)
Abstract views(301)
HTML views(27)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Re-examination of Hegel’s “The End of Art” in the Perspective of Hermeneutics

Liyuan ZHU

Available Online: 2022-02-20

Abstract: “The end of art” has always been the focus of academic circles, but most researchers agree that Hegel first proposed the thesis. Based on the perspective of hermeneutics, the paper explores whether the author’s original meaning has a certain legitimacy when interpreting a particular text. Heidegger and Gadamer, two representative figures of ontological hermeneutics, respectively sum up Hegel’s aesthetics with the thesis of “great art comes to an end” and “the past character of art”. The Paper compares Hegel’s text with Heidegger and Gadamer’s interpretation of Hegel, and analyses in detail, finds that Hegel himself has not put forward the thesis of “the end of art”. Although Heidegger and Gadamer’s interpretation of Hegel rely on the framework of ontological hermeneutics and creatively explain their understanding, they try to fit the original meaning of Hegel’s textin concrete analysis. This particular hermeneutic phenomenon means that the claim of methodological hermeneutics to seek the author’s original meaning is not entirely obsolete, it can complement ontological hermeneutics under certain conditions.

HTML

Relative (20)

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Return

Re-examination of Hegel’s “The End of Art” in the Perspective of Hermeneutics

Abstract

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Re-examination of Hegel’s “The End of Art” in the Perspective of Hermeneutics

HTML

目录