Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 54 Issue 10
January 2023
Article Contents

Citation: Xianbin YANG. Normative Explanation and Systematic Construction of Rules of Processing of Sensitive Personal Information in China[J]. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(10): 107-119. shu

Normative Explanation and Systematic Construction of Rules of Processing of Sensitive Personal Information in China

  • Personal Information Protection Law of the People’s Republic of China establishes strict restrictive principles and the informed consent rules in order to provide special protection for sensitive personal information, which is a breakthrough from domestic and international legislations. However, there are still many shortcomings about its normative system and it needs to be adjusted. In terms of the specific way, we should apply the rank theory of civil-law rights and interests and the theory of reasonable expectation of privacy to construct the restrictive rules of “specific purpose” and “sufficient necessity” to reasonably limit their scopes of application. And we should impose “the aforementioned abligation of calling attention or giving explanations” on the information processors. Except for exceptiones, the processing of sensitive personal information shall be based on the principle of “written consent” of the information subjects. The concept of setting rules for handling sensitive personal information shifts from “informed consent” to “risk prevention” and a progressive response plan can be created so as to respond the concept. And the informed consent rules appears limited condtion and the informed consent rules should be reinforced by restrictive principles. The impact assessment model of sensitive personal information has changed from a single assessment model to a composite assessment model, and a standardized and coordinated system should be established to eliminate the series of problems arising from it.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      Huiying FANG . The Value Orientation and Standardized Construction of the Principle of Modesty in Criminal Law. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(7): 117-125.

    2. [2]

      Fuping GAO . The Protection of Individuals with Regard to Processing of Personal Information. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(2): 107-124.

    3. [3]

      Guanbin SHI . Normative Construction and Value Orientation of Mental Damage Compensation System in Civil Code. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(4): 121-130.

    4. [4]

      Yanhong LIU . To Promote the Development of the Discourse System of Criminal Law by Scientific Legislation. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(4): 94-105.

    5. [5]

      Wenjun DUChao CHEN . Introduction and Adjustment: Localization Construction of the Exemption from Natural Punishment. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(1): 95-109.

    6. [6]

      Chunzhen GUOHaiyang WANG . Normative Structure of the Right to Erasure in Personal Information Protection. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(10): 92-106.

    7. [7]

      Shangjun ZHOU . The Organizational Formation and System Logic of China’s Legislative System. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(11): 95-107.

    8. [8]

      HAN Siyang . Public Law Intervention in Private Domain: Personal Information Protection in Platforms. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(5): 106-119.

    9. [9]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(01): 139-148.

    10. [10]

      Cheng Sumei . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(5): 36-44.

    11. [11]

      Lei LEI . The Characteristics of Legislation. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(1): 97-108.

    12. [12]

      Zebo YANG . Responding to “the Question of Qian Mu”. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(7): 13-21.

    13. [13]

      Haibo SUN . Reflections on Moral Legislation from the Perspective of Legal Philosophy. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(5): 106-119.

    14. [14]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(05): 48-48.

    15. [15]

      Xiaoliang ZHOU . Inclusive Green Development: Theoretical Interpretation and Institutional Support System. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(11): 41-54.

    16. [16]

      Xiaohong YUXiang WANG . People’s Assessors in China’s Political-legal Tradition: Institutional Changes and Developmental Logic. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(7): 105-120.

    17. [17]

      Shiye TIANPing LI . Changes of Rural Land Property Rights System in China from the Perspective of Development. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(12): 74-84.

    18. [18]

      Yongqian TUZiyue LUOXiafeng HU . The Information Security Clearance System in Americaand Its Inspiration. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(8): 65-77.

    19. [19]

      YANG Xianbin . On Rules for the Fair Use of Private Information and the Optimized Paths. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(6): 101-115.

    20. [20]

      Chunguang ZHANG . Modern Identity Crisis and Realistic Response of Confucian Ethics. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(10): 30-44.

Article Metrics

Article views: 309 Times PDF downloads: 1 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(1)
  • Abstract views(309)
  • HTML views(44)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        Normative Explanation and Systematic Construction of Rules of Processing of Sensitive Personal Information in China

        Abstract: Personal Information Protection Law of the People’s Republic of China establishes strict restrictive principles and the informed consent rules in order to provide special protection for sensitive personal information, which is a breakthrough from domestic and international legislations. However, there are still many shortcomings about its normative system and it needs to be adjusted. In terms of the specific way, we should apply the rank theory of civil-law rights and interests and the theory of reasonable expectation of privacy to construct the restrictive rules of “specific purpose” and “sufficient necessity” to reasonably limit their scopes of application. And we should impose “the aforementioned abligation of calling attention or giving explanations” on the information processors. Except for exceptiones, the processing of sensitive personal information shall be based on the principle of “written consent” of the information subjects. The concept of setting rules for handling sensitive personal information shifts from “informed consent” to “risk prevention” and a progressive response plan can be created so as to respond the concept. And the informed consent rules appears limited condtion and the informed consent rules should be reinforced by restrictive principles. The impact assessment model of sensitive personal information has changed from a single assessment model to a composite assessment model, and a standardized and coordinated system should be established to eliminate the series of problems arising from it.

          HTML

        Relative (20)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return