美学何去？门罗的跨文明比较美学之路

代 迅

English

美学何去？门罗的跨文明比较美学之路

引用本文: 代迅. 美学何去？门罗的跨文明比较美学之路[J]. 学术月刊, 2018, 50(04): 108-117. shu

Citation: . Where Will Aesthetics Go: Thomas Munro’s Way of Cross-civilization Comparative Aesthetics[J]. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(04): 108-117. shu

美学何去？门罗的跨文明比较美学之路

代迅

Where Will Aesthetics Go: Thomas Munro’s Way of Cross-civilization Comparative Aesthetics

摘要: 近现代西方由于自然科学的影响，推动美学研究走向科学化成为一种重要学术思潮。在以费希纳实验美学为代表的科学美学陷入困境的情况下，门罗敏锐地把目光投向了当时正在兴起的比较美学，认为这是另一条更符合美学自身发展规律的可行性道路。这既是科学美学“自下而上”研究思路的自然延伸，也使门罗成为西方学界跨文明比较美学的自觉先驱。门罗本人没有使用“跨文明比较美学”这个提法，他使用的术语是“比较美学”，“文明”和“文化”概念在门罗笔下也没有做出严格区分。“跨文明比较美学”的提法更准确，也更为切合门罗执意突破西方中心论、以东西方美学为核心的跨文明比较研究的含义。根据门罗的论述，西方跨文明比较美学的直接源头可上溯至黑格尔，有意识的自觉展开则是20 世纪40 年代以美国为代表的西方学界。门罗揭示了跨文明比较美学的基本内涵，并提出了寻找不同文明美学之间的共同性以建立普遍性美学理论的具体途径。经过近半个世纪的发展，跨文明比较美学已经成为国际主流学界广泛接受的重要研究范式。
Abstract: With the influence of natural science, it has been an important trend to scientize the research of aesthetics in modern Western countries. When the scientific aesthetics, represented by the Gustav Theodor Fechner’s experimental aesthetics, is in trouble, Thomas Munro keenly focuses on the emerging comparative aesthetics, he believesthat this is another feasible way which is more suitablefor the development law of aesthetic itself. This is not only a natural extension of an approach to “from below” approach of scientific aesthetics, but also the idea makes Munro become the pioneer of cross-civilization comparative aesthetics in Western countries. Munro himself does not use the formulation of “cross-civilization comparative aesthetics”, he uses the term of “comparative aesthetics”, and does not make a strict distinction between civilization and culture. The terminology of “cross-civilization comparative aesthetics” is more accurate and closer to Munro’s intention. Munro intends to break through occidental centrism, and regards the East and the West aesthetics as the core of cross-civilization comparative aesthetics.According to Munro, cross-civilization comparative aesthetics can be traced back to G. W. F. Hegel, the aestheticians of United States consciously develop the approach in 1940s. Munro reveals the basic connotation of cross-civilization comparative aesthetics, and puts forward the specific ways to find out the commonality shared by different civilizations to establish the universal aesthetic theory. After in around half a century, the cross-civilization comparative aesthetics has become an important research paradigm that has been widely accepted by the international mainstream academia
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片
1. [1]
  陈平原 . 声音的政治与美学. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(1): 146-166.
2. [2]
  程相占 . 审美欣赏理论：环境美学的独特美学观及其对于美学原理的推进. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(2): 151-159.
3. [3]
  夏中义 . 论朱光潜“有思想的美学”. 学术月刊, 2017, 49(12): 122-133.
4. [4]
  郭勇健 . 美学的两个维度. 学术月刊, 2023, 55(7): 142-151.
5. [5]
  高砚平 . 赫尔德论触觉：幽暗的美学. 学术月刊, 2018, 50(10): 130-139.
6. [6]
  高建平 . 美学在世纪之交的复兴. 学术月刊, 2020, 52(6): 111-121, 134.
7. [7]
  肖鹰 . 《红楼梦》的美学意蕴. 学术月刊, 2020, 52(9): 131-139.
8. [8]
  代迅 . 走出德国古典美学：中国美学发展的时代主题. 学术月刊, 2016, 48(11): 140-149.
9. [9]
  金雅 . 中国现代美学对中华美学精神的传承与发展. 学术月刊, 2018, 50(02): 114-122.
10. [10]
  蔡宗齐 , 何敏 . 跨文明研究视阈中的中国古典文学研究——蔡宗齐教授访谈. 学术月刊, 2017, 49(02): 179-184.
11. [11]
  代迅 . 走向荒野：风景的历史及其美学表达. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(6): 156-166.
12. [12]
  王元骧 . 关于推进“人生论美学”研究的思考. 学术月刊, 2017, 49(11): 99-134.
13. [13]
  潘知常 . “精致利己主义者”的美学书写. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(6): 195-204.
14. [14]
  仲霞 . “美学是第一哲学”的中国论说. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(7): 161-170.
15. [15]
  王振复 . 中国美学范畴体系的逻辑结构. 学术月刊, 2024, 56(1): 141-154.
16. [16]
  顾明栋 . 论中西小说理论的哲学和美学根基. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(11): 127-138.
17. [17]
  杨春时 . 论中华美学的诗学化特性. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(2): 144-151.
18. [18]
  刘旭光 . 论“审美理念”在康德美学中的作用—— 重构康德美学的一种可能. 学术月刊, 2017, 49(08): 141-151.
19. [19]
  刘成纪 . 礼乐美学与传统中国. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(6): 171-182.
20. [20]
  许明 . 美学与认知科学. 学术月刊, 2023, 55(8): 145-165.

点击查看大图

图(1)

计量

PDF下载量: 22
文章访问数: 3304
HTML全文浏览量: 441

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

美学何去？门罗的跨文明比较美学之路

代迅

摘要: 近现代西方由于自然科学的影响，推动美学研究走向科学化成为一种重要学术思潮。在以费希纳实验美学为代表的科学美学陷入困境的情况下，门罗敏锐地把目光投向了当时正在兴起的比较美学，认为这是另一条更符合美学自身发展规律的可行性道路。这既是科学美学“自下而上”研究思路的自然延伸，也使门罗成为西方学界跨文明比较美学的自觉先驱。门罗本人没有使用“跨文明比较美学”这个提法，他使用的术语是“比较美学”，“文明”和“文化”概念在门罗笔下也没有做出严格区分。“跨文明比较美学”的提法更准确，也更为切合门罗执意突破西方中心论、以东西方美学为核心的跨文明比较研究的含义。根据门罗的论述，西方跨文明比较美学的直接源头可上溯至黑格尔，有意识的自觉展开则是20 世纪40 年代以美国为代表的西方学界。门罗揭示了跨文明比较美学的基本内涵，并提出了寻找不同文明美学之间的共同性以建立普遍性美学理论的具体途径。经过近半个世纪的发展，跨文明比较美学已经成为国际主流学界广泛接受的重要研究范式。

English Abstract

Where Will Aesthetics Go: Thomas Munro’s Way of Cross-civilization Comparative Aesthetics

Abstract: With the influence of natural science, it has been an important trend to scientize the research of aesthetics in modern Western countries. When the scientific aesthetics, represented by the Gustav Theodor Fechner’s experimental aesthetics, is in trouble, Thomas Munro keenly focuses on the emerging comparative aesthetics, he believesthat this is another feasible way which is more suitablefor the development law of aesthetic itself. This is not only a natural extension of an approach to “from below” approach of scientific aesthetics, but also the idea makes Munro become the pioneer of cross-civilization comparative aesthetics in Western countries. Munro himself does not use the formulation of “cross-civilization comparative aesthetics”, he uses the term of “comparative aesthetics”, and does not make a strict distinction between civilization and culture. The terminology of “cross-civilization comparative aesthetics” is more accurate and closer to Munro’s intention. Munro intends to break through occidental centrism, and regards the East and the West aesthetics as the core of cross-civilization comparative aesthetics.According to Munro, cross-civilization comparative aesthetics can be traced back to G. W. F. Hegel, the aestheticians of United States consciously develop the approach in 1940s. Munro reveals the basic connotation of cross-civilization comparative aesthetics, and puts forward the specific ways to find out the commonality shared by different civilizations to establish the universal aesthetic theory. After in around half a century, the cross-civilization comparative aesthetics has become an important research paradigm that has been widely accepted by the international mainstream academia

全文HTML

图(1) 相关文章 (20)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

返回文章

用微信扫码二维码

分享至好友和朋友圈

美学何去？门罗的跨文明比较美学之路

Where Will Aesthetics Go: Thomas Munro’s Way of Cross-civilization Comparative Aesthetics

计量

文章相关

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

美学何去？门罗的跨文明比较美学之路

English Abstract

Where Will Aesthetics Go: Thomas Munro’s Way of Cross-civilization Comparative Aesthetics

全文HTML

目录