论朱子对《周易》卜筮性的重新确立及其解释学意义

林忠军

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

November 2020

Article Contents

Citation: Zhongjun LIN. On Zhu Xi’s Re-establishment of Divination of Zhouyi and Explanation of Yi-ology[J]. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(9): 28-38. shu

On Zhu Xi’s Re-establishment of Divination of Zhouyi and Explanation of Yi-ology

Zhongjun LIN

Abstract

Zhu Xi advocated that the explanation of Yi-ology should start with the divination and restore divinatory discourse in Zhouyi text, mainly for correcting the deviation of emphasizing philosophical connotation and neglecting divination. He did not intend to oppose divination to philosophical connotation, and denied the connotation of divinatory discourse in Zhouyi. Instead, he regarded divination and philosophical connotation as an integral part of the Zhouyi. He proposed that the explanation of Yi-ology should first be interpreted by divinatory discourse, and then deduce its philosophical connotation. From this point of view, the relationship among Xiang (“象”, images), numbers (“数”), Ci (“辞”, words) and Li (“理”, principles) in Zhouyi from the perspective of divination, that is, there is Li first and then there are Xiang and numbers. The symbols of Xiang and numbers are the expression forms of Li, and the three are inseparable. In terms of hermeneutics, on the one hand, Zhu Xi acknowledged that Zhouyi was a divinatory book, respected historical tradition, and opposed to separating one part of history from the continuum artificially and ignoring textual divination and Xiang and numbers formed in the perspective of divination.On the other hand, Zhu Xi did not just stick to the history, but focused on the openness of textual meaning, took the explanation of “the way of sages” as the goal, and acknowledged the reasonable prejudices, made by Confucius, Wang Bi, Cheng Yi and other scholars, which were close to the principle of Zhouyi in accordance with “reality” or “present” in their respective periods. He proposed a clear and complete explanation path for philosophical interpretation of the Yi-ology, that was, from the perspective of historical development, starting with the divination explanation, explaining the abstract “Yin and Yang” with visual symbols of Xiang and numbers, which completed the interpretation from history to reality, from the Xiang and numbers of divination to the philosophy interpretation of Yi-ology.
- Zhu Xi,
- divination,
- Xiang (images) and numbers,
- philosophical connotation,
- the explanation of Yi-ology
References
Access
1. [1]
  Liuhua ZHANG . Inferentialism: Logic and Theory of Meaning. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(5): 28-38.
2. [2]
  , . . Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(1): 208-216.
3. [3]
  GAO Song . From Animal to AI—— A Phenomenological Investigation into Various Forms of Meaning-understanding. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(11): 15-27.
4. [4]
  Zhongjun LIN . Reflection and Reconstruction of the Contemporary Studies of The Book of Change in China. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(1): 31-38.
5. [5]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(04): 40-53.
6. [6]
  . Between Human Society and Buddhism—— Local Cooperators’ Ethic Dilemma and Its Extrication in Early Qing Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(03): 151-163.
7. [7]
  Qintong LI . The Confucianization of Law and Its Explanation. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(8): 157-169.
8. [8]
  Wanhuai SUN . A New Expression of Position Interpreting Criminal Law. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(9): 95-109.
9. [9]
  Lizhong XIE . Interpretation, Fully Interpretation and Construction ofGeneral Theories. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(5): 119-127.
10. [10]
  Jie ZHANG . The “Excessive” Expansion of Financial Industry: The Fact and Interpretation from China. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(10): 60-76.
11. [11]
  MEI Jianhua . Pluralist Approaches to Understand Consciousness and Explanatory Gap. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(10): 25-35.
12. [12]
  Weiping HE . Hermeneutical Circle and Meno’s Paradox. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(11): 15-23, 39.
13. [13]
  Zhengxu WANG . Order and Prosperity: An Institutionalist Framework for First Questions of Politics. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(3): 110-123.
14. [14]
  Jun XUE . Declaration of Behavior Ability in Chinese Law: Connotation of System and Reconstruction of Theory of Interpretation. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(12): 95-105.
15. [15]
  , , . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(11): 70-83.
16. [16]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(02): 103-113.
17. [17]
  Yun CHEN . Two Interpretation Orientations of the Debate on the Small and the Big in Zhuangzi and their Effective Ranges. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(8): 13-26.
18. [18]
  Lei LIU . Constitutional Explanation of Chinese Land System: Issues, Disputes and Balance. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(1): 105-114.
19. [19]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(02): 154-162.
20. [20]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(01): 86-91.

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 1018 Times PDF downloads: 10 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(10)
Abstract views(1018)
HTML views(104)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

On Zhu Xi’s Re-establishment of Divination of Zhouyi and Explanation of Yi-ology

Zhongjun LIN

Available Online: 2020-09-21

Abstract: Zhu Xi advocated that the explanation of Yi-ology should start with the divination and restore divinatory discourse in Zhouyi text, mainly for correcting the deviation of emphasizing philosophical connotation and neglecting divination. He did not intend to oppose divination to philosophical connotation, and denied the connotation of divinatory discourse in Zhouyi. Instead, he regarded divination and philosophical connotation as an integral part of the Zhouyi. He proposed that the explanation of Yi-ology should first be interpreted by divinatory discourse, and then deduce its philosophical connotation. From this point of view, the relationship among Xiang (“象”, images), numbers (“数”), Ci (“辞”, words) and Li (“理”, principles) in Zhouyi from the perspective of divination, that is, there is Li first and then there are Xiang and numbers. The symbols of Xiang and numbers are the expression forms of Li, and the three are inseparable. In terms of hermeneutics, on the one hand, Zhu Xi acknowledged that Zhouyi was a divinatory book, respected historical tradition, and opposed to separating one part of history from the continuum artificially and ignoring textual divination and Xiang and numbers formed in the perspective of divination.On the other hand, Zhu Xi did not just stick to the history, but focused on the openness of textual meaning, took the explanation of “the way of sages” as the goal, and acknowledged the reasonable prejudices, made by Confucius, Wang Bi, Cheng Yi and other scholars, which were close to the principle of Zhouyi in accordance with “reality” or “present” in their respective periods. He proposed a clear and complete explanation path for philosophical interpretation of the Yi-ology, that was, from the perspective of historical development, starting with the divination explanation, explaining the abstract “Yin and Yang” with visual symbols of Xiang and numbers, which completed the interpretation from history to reality, from the Xiang and numbers of divination to the philosophy interpretation of Yi-ology.

HTML

Relative (20)

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Return

On Zhu Xi’s Re-establishment of Divination of Zhouyi and Explanation of Yi-ology

Abstract

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

On Zhu Xi’s Re-establishment of Divination of Zhouyi and Explanation of Yi-ology

HTML

目录